On 4/6/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Not necessarily all the best of breed components but what fits into RHEL > product space. RHEL is open source too. So its Free in that aspect RHEL is not open source in that I can download and use it without paying a support fee for it. Piggy-back support clauses are standard with regard to "the software is free however you may only use it so long as your support contract is paid up." Not a bad thing; even RedHat has to feed itself (in a corporate sort of way.) That is where open source product lines differ: commercially "available" open source and "truly" open source. If I am mistaken, regarding either above, please enlighten me. -- WC (Bill) Jones -- http://youve-reached-the.endoftheinternet.org/ -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list