On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 11:17 -0800, Gerry Tool wrote: > Dan Thurman wrote: > > Folks, > > > > As I suspected when I first installed FC5-T3, that somehow the > network > > cards are being setup backwards when setting it up via anaconda. My > > eth0 and eth1 cards are backwards from anaconda but when I finally > > got all my stuff updated and installed in FC5-T3, what I did was to > > blow away the ifcfg-eth0 & ifcfg-eth1 definition files (setup > initially > > via anaconda) in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts and ensured these > also > > did not exists in /etc/sysconfig/networking, I rebooted the system > and > > sure enough these files did not exists nor did I expect it to. So, > > proceeding and selected gnome-menu: System->Administration->Network, > > I looked into the hardware devices tab and the eth0 and eth1 NIC > cards > > were properly assigned as I expected it to be. So it was a simple > > matter of completing the rest of the parameters and everything is > setup > > just fine. > > > > I find this behavior exactly the same with the production release of > FC5 > > as well. > > > > So, my point is, that if you multi-boot as I do, Fedora is the one > that > > is choosing the NIC cards is backwards compared to other OS's I have > > installed in my system and all because anaconda asks for eth0 and > eth1 > > settings in a backward fashion. Now that I got it corrected, I can > MB > > to different OS's without being forced to change my network cable > > assignments. > > > > Please fix this behavior and get it right. > > > > Kind regards, > > Dan > > > > > If you expect to get it fixed, this list is not the only place to note > it. > File a bug in bugzilla.redhat.com, otherwise it is not a bug. > Bug #187301 is filed. > > -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list