I must admit that your argument is a very good one and one I will take as my answer. I just hope that the attention that gcj and evince have had to make them ready for prime time will translate over to these other "holes". Thanks Joe <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: I will say that I personally would prefer if this project continues to take a very hardline stance with regard to providing a complete open-source experience, instead of providing pre-configured links to any proprietary solutions to fill in the gaps in the foss stack. I'm fully prepared to live with gaps in both software and hardware support to encourage development of open source solutions over proprietary ones. Even if that project policy impacts the release's overall userbase popularity because of the incremental annoyance of finding 3rd party repositories... i believe its worth it if the annoyance factor spurs increased interest in open and distributable implementations of the missing functionality. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list