On Sunday 05 March 2006 13:58, Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday 03 March 2006 09:57, Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Below is the output of running uptime immediately after free on two > > occasions. The buffers, cached, and free memory numbers have decreased. > > Does this indicate a leak? The machine is totally idle, I have had a > > single ssh session open for all this time, no-one else has logged in, and > > it's not being used for any server tasks apart from light DNS serving. > > My machine in question has just run out of memory and crashed. It had been > operating OK until I tried to copy a set of Fedora ISO files to it's NFS > share. I conclude that the bugs which Steve fixed were not the ones that > afflict my machine. > > I'm now upgrading it to 2.6.15-1.2009.4.2_FC5, I'll see if that fixes it. The machine in question has been running 2.6.15-1.2032.2.3_FC5.lspp.12 for over 8 days now with no sign of a memory leak (and incidentally the load on the machine has increased). I believe that 2.6.15-1.2032.2.3_FC5.lspp.12 has fixed the memory leak problems I experienced. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list