On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 10:14:51AM -0800, L. David Baron wrote: > On Saturday 2006-03-18 12:40 -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote: > > L. David Baron wrote: > > >I just installed FC5t3 x86_64 on a brand new desktop machine with a > > >Radeon X300SE, and ran into two issues that seem more likely related to > > >that than anything else: > > > > > >(1) Neither the installer, nor system-config-display once the installer > > >had finished, were able to configure xorg so that it would start. > > >However, I was able to do it manually by doing "modprobe radeon" and > > >then rerunning system-config-display (which in turn writes out an > > >xorg.conf that causes xorg to modprobe radeon by itself). This suggests > > >to me that something along the way (I'm not sure what) should have done > > >a "modprobe radeon" to bootstrap the whole thing, but didn't. (And > > >perhaps does for other cards.) > > > > Ok, that doesn't make much sense to me at all. Dave disabled the radeon > > kernel DRM module support for all R300+ chips due to it causing X to > > hang when DRM loads if "Load "dri"" is present in the xorg.conf - > > regardless of wether or not we actually ship the r300 DRI module. > > > > So, loading the radeon module by hand should technically have no effect > > on R300 hardware unless I'm missing something. > > Well, it did. what does lspci -n | grep 1002 say ? Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list