On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 12:33 -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote: > Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > On 3/17/06, Gilboa Davara <gilboad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>What alternative are you offering to power our Xgl/Bling/what-ever > >>desktops? (Let alone running Quake4 at 1600x1200...) > > > > > > Doesn't the intel graphics sets now provide enough open support for bling? > > So, everyone who wants to have Bling is then forced to purchase an > Intel motherboard with Intel CPU? Thanks, but no thanks. maybe the other question is: if it's not possible to deliver an open source desktop bling for a wide enough range of hardware.. is it then worth doing the bling at all ? or should the bling be rethought to work with open source X and kernel ;) -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list