On 3/10/06, Philippe Rigault <prigault@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I see, I misinterpreted the fact that all packages have a last modification > date of March 6 or after, it is true that most carry the same name as in > test3. Most of them have therefore been touch'ed and not rebuild, right ? modification date as listed on mirrors isn't a good measure of build date. Pretty sure modification date can change when packages are last signed.. which is not the same day they were built. rpm packages hold a build date header string which you can more accurately rely on, assuming you trust the buildsystem which built the packages not to lie to you and stick in the wrong date. case in point rpm -qi tetex Build Date: Sat 25 Feb 2006 05:01:41 Signature : DSA/SHA1, Mon 06 Mar 2006 03:42:47 PM EST, Key ID b44269d04f2a6fd2 For post test3 build dates... please refer to the available build reports achived in this mailinglist which contain relevant package changelog snippets which reference specific bug reports fixed which the associated update. As you continue to look back over the archives please also look for previous discussions associated with the gcc/glibc fixes to make sure you have all the information possible before making more judgements as to this process. -jef -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list