Re: Help Needed: TEST FC5 KERNELS!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 11:44:31 -0500
> From: Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Help Needed: TEST FC5 KERNELS!
> To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx,       For testers of Fedora Core
>         development releases    <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <440F09EF.10009@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/devel/
>
> If you are running rawhide FC5 on any architecture, please update to the
> latest kernel here often, reboot and test.  We need your feedback very
> quickly if a new kernel here causes regressions, because we are rapidly
> approaching what will become the FC5 final kernel.
>
> If your box is SMP or dual-core, please test booting the uniprocessor
> and multi-processor kernels if your architecture has both kernel builds.
>   In cases where we have separate uniprocessor and SMP kernels (x86 and
> ppc), we need both tested because the installer uses uniprocessor while
> your yum updated system might not by default.
>
> Please keep in mind that we are only interested in regressions in things
> that would break installation and booting at this point.  If issue has
> always existed in past Fedora, then it would not be useful to push it
> again now.  PLEASE REPORT ONLY REGRESSIONS
>
> Thank you,
> Warren Togami
> wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx

Hi,

Tested on x86_64 (Acer Ferrari 4005WLMi)

Compared with 2.6.15-1_1955_FC5:
 - No regressions.
 - Critical bug 174068 seems fixed with this kernel, Great!

Cheers,

Philippe

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]