Re: fedora-test-list Digest, Vol 25, Issue 32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Should not mount from Fedora know about  LVM partitions and how to  setup access?

Yes, you are right, both disks have LVM file systems.



4. Re: Silly thing like a mount command appears to not be
working correctly? (Richard Hally)
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 21:04:13 -0800 (PST)
From: Leslie Satenstein
Subject: Silly thing like a mount command appears to not be working
correctly?
To: fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <20060308050413.78721.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Here is the scenario

Fedora core4 on a dedicated 80 gig drive /hdb. (All install defaults taken)

Fedora core5 on a 200 gig dedicated drive. (All def! aults taken)

Using system bios, I can boot from either drive.

I can mount the boot partition from either system to the other, but I cannot mount the data partitions.

My commands were (from root)

mkdir /other (on each hard drive)


mount -t ext3 /dev/hda? /other
where I tried ? from 7 all the way to 1. On the core4 system,
The system could not find values of /dev/hda7 through 3 . Refused /dev/hda2 and showed me the boot partition for /dev/hda1


On the core5 test3 system using the default values as set up by annaconda at install time, I could see the boot partition on /dev/hdb1 but no other partition.
Is there something I am doing wrong? I tried many flavours of xxx for the mount -t xxxx (auto, ext2, ext3) , eluding -t parameter.

Your test against a vanilla corex drive would be appreciated.

Leslie

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20060307/947695cc/attachment.html

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:16:55 -0500
From: Richard Hally
Subject: Re: Silly thing like a mount command appears to not be
working correctly?
To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases

Message-ID: <440E68C7.40605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Leslie Satenstein wrote:
> Here is the scenario
>
> Fedora core4 on a dedicated 80 gig drive /hdb. (All install defaults taken)
>
> Fedora core5 on a 200 gig dedicated drive. (All defaults taken)
>
> Using system bios, I can boot from either drive.
>
> I can mount the boot partition from either system to the other, but I
> cannot mount the data partitions.
>
> My co! mmands were (from root)
>
> mkdir /other (on each hard drive)
>
>
> mount -t ext3 /dev/hda? /other
> where I tried ? from 7 all the way to 1. On the core4 system,
> The system could not find values of /dev/hda7 through 3 . Refused
> /dev/hda2 and showed me the boot partition for /dev/hda1
>
>
> On the core5 test3 system using the default values as set up by
> annaconda at install time, I could see the boot partition on /dev/hdb1
> but no other partition.
> Is there something I am doing wrong? I tried many flavours of xxx for
> the mount -t xxxx (auto, ext2, ext3) , eluding -t parameter.
>
> Your test against a vanilla corex drive would be appreciated.
>
> Leslie
>
Your problem may have to do with the fact that default installs use LVM
for partitions other than /boot.
 


-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]