Re: Faster network?

[Uno Engborg <uno@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff Vian wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 10:34 +0100, shrek-m@xxxxxx wrote:
>   
> > On 03.03.2006 09:12, Mike Chambers wrote:
> >
> >     
> > > echo 256960 >> /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_default
> > > echo 256960 >> /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max
> > > echo 256960 >> /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_default
> > > echo 256960 >> /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_max
> > > echo 0 >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps
> > > echo 1 >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_sack
> > > echo 1 >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling
> > >
> > >       
> > why  ">>"   ?
> > imho this should be  ">"
> >
> >
> >     
> For me it works with either syntax, but AFAIK the > is the best (and
> most universal) choice
> is not more universal than >>. The difference is that >> appends to 
an existing file
while > starts writing the file from the beginning. So if the file you 
are >:ing to contains
lines you want to keep they will be gone if you do >.

Regards
Uno Engborg

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list