Re: FC5, progression or regression?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:39:09PM -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
 > On 2/27/06, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 > > Current kernels still have slab debugging on (Because we still have
 > > bugs that this is tripping up that need whacking).  The increased
 > > overhead of this sucks up memory bandwidth, and I wouldn't be
 > > surprised if shared-memory video chipsets feel some pain.
 > 
 > Would it be enough to install and boot into the latest fc4 update
 > kernel to make a rough attempt to isolate the affect of enabled kernel
 > debugging from xorg driver issues? or has there been too much shift in
 > the rawhide kernel from rev 1831 for that comparison to be useful at
 > all?

Not something I've tested personally, so I've not got a definitive answer.
I'd put money on things like udev complaining about the kernel being not new enough.
Other than that though, should be ok-ish. Maybe.

		Dave

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]