Re: FC5T3: Why only so few screensavers available to choose in in KDE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Vian wrote:

There are 3 additionals RPM available
xscreensaver-extras-4.24-1.1
xscreensaver-gl-extras-4.24-1.1
xscreensaver-base-4.24-1.1

xscreensaver-base package helped a lot, thanks!

Question still remains: why not all installed (in default install) screensavers are listed in Control Center?



The screensavers package used to include all the screensavers and many
people were having problems because the gl screensavers were causing
lock-ups on systems that could not run the gl packages in X.
AIUI, the base package does not have any of the gl screensavers so that
is avoided. The extras and gl-extras are just that -- additional
screensavers that some might want.

I believe there was also a security issue with some of the extras
screensavers in that they would actually display what was on the desktop
while using sections of the display as puzzle pieces or morphing them.
The ability had to be available to NOT allow that type of screensaver
for organizations with high security requirements.  Separating the
packages simplifies that.

There is no shortcomings with the xscreensaver program being split into three packages. The issue is with the introduction of gnome-screensaver which is poorly configurable. (Blank screen, one screensaver, disabled or every single screensaver that is available.)

This limits the ability to choose to disable screensavers from a selection menu which are completely undesirable, have a potential security risk by showing items which are visible if the screensaver was not active.

Adding configurability and little "ratings" icons to the gnome-screensaver configurator would be alright to have,(Security Risk,known Video problems,you really don't want this and on!) Not having the ability to control and decide which screensavers you want displayed or disabled via gnome-screensaver is no good at all.

Releasing such a poorly configurable program is not a valuable choice.

Jim
Is this a bug?

Regards,
Dariusz




--
Well fix that in the next (upgrade, update, patch release, service pack).

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]