Re: FC5T3: Duplicate packages installed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 15:36 -0600, Jonathan Berry wrote:
> 
> Why is this not the default queryformat for x86_64?  It would cut down
> on a lot of confusion and noise for those new to the x86_64 platform. 
> And I do not see what it would hurt to make it default in all cases if
> it complicates things to make it default for only x86_64.  It's fairly
> simple to add this to your .rpmmacros, but the people who will know to
> do this will already know about the dual-arch stuff. 

Because changing the expected output of rpm -q is a bad bad thing.
Don't do that.  Of course people shouldn't be screen scraping the output
or relying on it w/out doing their own --qf for ensured stability,
people do anyway, and we'd rather not break all their scripts.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]