On 2/26/06, Mike A. Harris <mharris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jonathan Berry wrote: > > On 2/25/06, Mike A. Harris <mharris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>If you are using Nvidia video hardware with FC5test3 or later, and the > >>mouse cursor is invisible, or has any visible mouse pointer corruption, > >>please add a comment to the following bug report to confirm you are > >>having the same problem, and attach your X server log file as an > >>uncompressed file attachment: > >> > >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182517 > >> > >>2 chips have been identified as experiencing this problem so far, so > >>once people have updated the report with any other chips that have > >>the problem, I am going to disable hardware cursors on those chips > >>by default so that things work out of the box in FC5 for as many > >>nv users as possible. > > > > > > I do *not* see any mouse pointer corruption on my system. x86_64 with > > a 6600 GT. From lspci: > > 05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV43 [GeForce > > 6600 GT] (rev a2) > > That's not a PCI ID, but a textual description of a video card. > PCI ID is 2 32bit hex numbers of the form VENDOR:DEVICE > > lspci -vn > > It's the numerical value that matters from a programmatical > standpoint. If it turns out 2 people have the same device > ID, but one has no cursor, and the other works fine, that would > be useful information to add to the X.Org bug reprot for the > driver maintainer though. Ahh, sorry. Here is the info from lspci -vn (looks like the PCI ID is two 16-bit numbers ; ) ): 05:00.0 0300: 10de:0140 (rev a2) Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 12 Memory at e8000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64M] Memory at e0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M] Memory at ec000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M] [virtual] Expansion ROM at ed000000 [disabled] [size=128K] Capabilities: [60] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [68] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable- Capabilities: [78] Express Endpoint IRQ 0 Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel Capabilities: [128] Power Budgeting Would you like me to add this to the RedHat bugzilla, the Xorg bugzilla, or both? Looks like most people have been adding to the RH one. Jonathan -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list