On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 11:46 -0800, Miles Lane wrote: > On 2/17/06, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2/17/06, n0dalus <n0dalus+redhat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I agree that neither of the reasons they list are very good. Having > > > one extra button to open a second dialogue hardly clutters the UI, and > > > makes it no harder for the user. To let system admins lock down > > > settings, they should simply provide a "Don't show or let users open > > > advanced controls." key. > > > > UI issues aside..you'd have to store the per-user configs somewhere... > > that means making room in GConf for per-xscreensaver-hack > > configuration keys. Which means creating schema for each and every > > xscreensaver-hack which could take per-user configs as well as keys > > which can be applied across all screensaver-hacks on a per-user basis. > > So that it could be locked down at a site policy level. > > So, do you know who to contact to make this happen? Do you think this > would be considered? Who would have to be convinced? > As mentioned already, screensaver-list@xxxxxxxxx is the list to talk to. The only way to know if your ideas will be considered is to propose them there. Matthias -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list