On Monday 13 February 2006 8:47 am, shrek-m@xxxxxx wrote: > On 13.02.2006 14:20, John Pearson wrote: > >>I believe smbfs has been dropped in favour of cifs, since smbfs is not > >>maintained anymore. > > > >Huh? See: > > > >http://us4.samba.org/samba/news/#3.0.21b > > http://us4.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.0.21b.html > > (search for cifs, a lot of hits, eg.) > > Release Notes for Samba 3.0.21 Dec 20, 2005 > > [...] > o Complete NTLMv2 support by consolidating authentication mechanism used > at the CIFS and RPC layers. > > (search for smbfs, 1 hit) > > Release Notes for Samba 3.0.3 April 29, 2004 > [...] > > * Fix smbfs problem with Tree Disconnect issued before smbfs starts its > work. > > -- > shrek-m Thank you, reading now. -jp -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list