On Monday 13 February 2006 8:24 am, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > >>I believe smbfs has been dropped in favour of cifs, since smbfs is not > >>maintained anymore. > >> > >> > >>-- > >>Roy-Magne Mo <rmo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >Huh? See: > > > >http://us4.samba.org/samba/news/#3.0.21b > > > > # yum info samba > >Loading "installonlyn" plugin > >Setting up repositories > >Reading repository metadata in from local files > >Available Packages > >Name : samba > >Arch : i386 > >Version: 3.0.20b > >Release: 2.1 > >Size : 15 M > >Repo : development > >Summary: The Samba SMB server. > >Description: > > > >... > > Smbfs is the in-kernel implementation and has been replaced with CIFS. > Samba is user space. Not the same thing. > > > -- > Rahul > > Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers Thank you for the clarification. -jp -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list