On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:41:05AM +0100, shrek-m@xxxxxx wrote: > On 13.02.2006 09:18, oldman wrote: > > >Hmm... I didn't see a part 1, But GMane got it! Thanks Jesse > > thanks, > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/36289 > > "bump again for double-long bug on ppc(64)" > > sorry, what is the meaning of "double-long" in this context ? Please read that as: "bump again to make sure long double is 128-bit on ppc32" There has been a bug in gcc <= 4.1.0-0.23, where although -mlong-double-128 was default for ppc64/s390/s390x/alpha/sparc and for ppc32 in gcc{-c++} packages, if gcc-ppc32 and/or gcc-c++-ppc32 packages were installed, -mlong-double-64 was the default for 32-bit code (missing --with-long-double-128 configure option in the configure command for the gcc-*ppc32 compiler). Jakub -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list