Re: SELinux and NSS [was: Problem with NSS update - Firefox, Evolution]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/6/06, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jonathan Berry wrote:
> > On 1/31/06, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> setsebool -P allow_execmem=1
> >
> > This allows Evolution to run, but Firefox still complains about not
> > being able to do the security stuff.  Still need to setenforce 0 to
> > access https.  Besides, this seems like a rather far reaching "fix."
> > Not that I'm exactly sure what exactly it does....
> >
> > Jonathan
>
> Rereading your posts.  Are you sure this is an SELinux problem?  If you
> setenforce 0, does firefox/evolution work?

Sorry for the lag.  Well, it seems related to SELinux at least as,
yes, setenforce 0 allows Firefox and Evolution work.  Firefox will run
with setenforce 1, but cannot do anything related to SSL.  Evolution
refuses to start because of it.  I'm still seeing this problem.

Jonathan

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]