On 2/4/06, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 12:50:08PM -0500, cjones@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Friday 03 February 2006 23:14, Claude Jones wrote: > > > On Fri February 3 2006 9:19 pm, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > x86-64 ? If so, yes. > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > Doesn't ring a bell. I'll post them tomorrow when I'm back in the office. > > > Thanks. > > Here's what I've got > > > > rpm -qa | grep glibc > > glibc-devel-2.3.90-30 > > glibc-devel-2.3.90-34 > > glibc-2.3.90-34 > > glibc-2.3.90-30 > > glibc-common-2.3.90-34 > > I'll ask again. Is this an x86-64 ? If so, having two glibc's is normal. > > Dave Agreed, but shouldn't they be the same version in the case of an x86_64 install? I'll have to check my devel boot here sometime. Jonathan -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list