Re: rawhide report: 20060203 changes (touch errors)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/4/06, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 12:50:08PM -0500, cjones@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>  > On Friday 03 February 2006 23:14, Claude Jones wrote:
>  > > On Fri February 3 2006 9:19 pm, Dave Jones wrote:
>  > > > x86-64 ? If so, yes.
>  > > >
>  > > > Dave
>  > >
>  > > Doesn't ring a bell. I'll post them tomorrow when I'm back in the office.
>  > > Thanks.
>  > Here's what I've got
>  >
>  > rpm -qa | grep glibc
>  > glibc-devel-2.3.90-30
>  > glibc-devel-2.3.90-34
>  > glibc-2.3.90-34
>  > glibc-2.3.90-30
>  > glibc-common-2.3.90-34
>
> I'll ask again. Is this an x86-64 ? If so, having two glibc's is normal.
>
>                 Dave

Agreed, but shouldn't they be the same version in the case of an
x86_64 install?  I'll have to check my devel boot here sometime.

Jonathan

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]