On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 09:09:18PM -0800, Miles Lane wrote: > Are you a FC developer? Have you checked the behavior? I can't at the moment, as I am away from my Rawhide boxes. > It is unconditional. So, I should file a bug, eh? Okay, I found it. It's this change: http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/cvsview2.cgi?diff_mode=context&whitespace_mode=show&file=window.c&branch=&root=/cvs/gnome&subdir=metacity/src&command=DIFF_FRAMESET&rev1=1.406&rev2=1.407 http://tinyurl.com/amwfc It was partially backed out a few days later with this: http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/cvsview2.cgi?diff_mode=context&whitespace_mode=show&file=window.c&branch=&root=/cvs/gnome&subdir=metacity/src&command=DIFF_FRAMESET&rev1=1.412&rev2=1.413 http://tinyurl.com/9fsgn The new behaviour is still there for terminals. > Again, I think Fedora should reject this change to Metacity. > I know that Redhat maintains custom kernel patches. Can we > have a Metacity that doesn't implement this nutty window management? This is where the author of the change explains the rationale: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326159 > Does Fedora Core have any influence over the development decisions > of the Metacity project? Are we simply at the mercy of their whims? I think at least a couple of Metacity developers, including the person that started the project, are RH employees. :-) -- Rudi -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list