On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 10:49 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 09:33 +0000, Paul F. Johnson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > GFS-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.9.i686 requires kernel = 0:2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5 > > > GFS-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.9.i686 requires /lib/modules/2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5smp > > > cman-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.10.i686 requires kernel = 0:2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5 > > > cman-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.10.i686 requires kernel-smp = 0:2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5 > > > dlm-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.8.i686 requires kernel = 0:2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5 > > > dlm-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.8.i686 requires /lib/modules/2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5smp > > > gnbd-kernel - 2.6.14.0-20051108.134753.FC5.14.i686 requires /lib/modules/2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5 > > > gnbd-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.0-20051108.134753.FC5.14.i686 requires /lib/modules/2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5smp > > > > I've not looked into this, but shouldn't these be rebuilt automatically > > - they seem to be broken more often than they're not. > > ... or dropped from core and moved to extras ... ... or just dropped, since their maintainers are showing absolutely no interest or responsibility for the packages. -- Peter -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list