On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 21:38 +1030, n0dalus wrote: > Hi, > > Since FC doesn't come with much 3d hardware acceleration support, is > it a bit too much to assume that computers will be able to run the > default screensaver? I have a very good computer and it is still very > jerky when running the screensaver. I'm sure installing Nvidia/Radeon > drivers would fix this but since Fedora doesn't come with them, I > think we should either work to make the screensaver faster, or choose > a different default for FC5. > > What do other people think about this? Do other people experience this slowness? > > n0dalus. > I do notice that with the default screensaver, every time I unlock my laptop the CPU is pinned and cpuspeed is 100%, all due to the screen saver. I know I can switch it to just blank (and do) but it seems like it's a bit to resource heavy as a default. It may be saving my screen but it's not saving my battery! tjb ======================================================================= | Thomas Baker email: tjb@xxxxxxx | | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | ======================================================================= -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list