2006/1/26, Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 19:38 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > manually for the test/devel releases which is limited. If you must use > > a everything installation on unusual occasions then kickstart is > > powerful enough to manage that and tons more. If you can work on making > > kickstart profile generation in a web interface and similar things > > easier apart from the system-config-kickstart GUI tool I would welcome > > that. Work is already being done to document kickstart capabilities > > better in the installation guide. > > Requiring kickstart abilities to achieve that is a bit over the top, > don't you think? I don't think we want to put the hurdles much higher > than the "yum --exclude=\*-debuginfo\* install \*" if we want people to > test Fedora Rawhide (and we would effectively do it if we e.g. > documented the kickstart but not the yum way). > > Nils > -- > Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759 > PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 > > -- > fedora-test-list mailing list > fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list > in my opinion everything install should definitely available since it helps with testing aswell doesent it? and generally... we "everything installers" test alot more aspects of the system. i wouldnt want to see that option removed personally. just my personal opinion. regards, Rudolf Kastl -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list