Re: FC5T2 and ndiswrapper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



lør, 21 01 2006 kl. 08:50 -0500, skrev Neal Becker:

> It's not quite correct, but OK for fedora devel (problem is kernel claims to
> be 2.6.15 when it's really 2.6.16gitsomething)

I wouldn't call that a problem really, more a sane and natural design
decision - afterall the final 2.6.16 isn't out yet why should we give
people the impression they are running it.
It's my impression that rpm doesn't take kindly to the kernel versioning
scheme, that is to say we can't name kernels by the git release as part
of the version number - the current solution must therefore be the most
natural way to name kernels.

- David

-- 
Obligatory shameless blog plug - The GNOME commentary located at
www.lovesunix.net/blog
 


-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]