Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 04:44:45PM -0700, Don Springall wrote:
> Since this source file is 2.6.16-rc1-git1 plus redhat patches should it not
> be named Kernel-2.6.16-1.1861_FC5.src.rpm and be built into
> /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.6.16 by rpmbuild ?
No. The final 'x' part of 2.6.x in the version string only gets
bumped when the tarball the rpm is based on is 2.6.16
Dave
And just to spell things out a bit more, this seems consistent with FC
Test numbering... 4.90 is a (post-4) development release of FC 5 just as
2.6.15-xxxxx is a post-2.6.15 development release of 2.6.16. The
changelog has been great about noting which version of the kernel a
release is actually based on, so for those that really care, the info is
readily available via rpm -q --changelog.
DC
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list