seth vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Why is tpb needed as opposed to /proc/acpi/ibm? > > > > Actually, why isn't tpb written as a interface neutral wrapper > > around HAL? > > > > > - include appropriate acpi scripts and put them in the right places > > > > Similarly, this should be done via generic callouts in g-p-m or similar. > > no b/c if you're not logged in - but just sitting at the gdm screen, for > example, the g-p-m doesn't work and your system won't suspend. We're working on that. As for the stuff tpb handles, why would you need to mute the gdm screen? :) Bill -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list