Nathan Grennan wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Kindly enable SELinux and make sure it works rather than disabling it
during the test releases thereby ensuring that problems dont get
fixed. Reports bugs and post to this list if required. Firstboot
stuff is optional. So the installer becomes more streamlined. If you
want to change the developer's mind you need to provide detailed
reasons.
I have run into too many selinux only bugs to leave it enabled,
especially with httpd. By it's very nature selinux goes against the
KISS principle. I understand that part of the point of releasing and
using test releases is for such testing, but why try to fix what is
broken by design?
Your two cents I guess. Would like to hear in detail the design issues
and how to fix them taking into consideration the effect of the new
reference policy.
I have since thought that users could just revert to i386 UP kernels
if they had to, but on the flip side I have thought of situations were
SMP only could be a real problem. One example would be a driver a user
needs that is known to not play well with SMP. Their only recourse is
to either wait till the driver is fixed, or revert to a i386 install.
Or report the problem and get this fixed.
File a bug report.
Ok, I expected the a developer to come back with an excuse similar to
the one I have gotten about using partition labels to mount.
Always worth a try.
---
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list