On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 08:59:57AM -0800, Nathan Grennan wrote: > came with the fact I hadn't rebooted. Overall I think the trend to > moving everything to firstboot is a bad one, but I don't expect to be > able to change the developers minds'. The selinux + firstboot one seems to be a bug if selinux doesnt get disabled at that point properly - file a bug > 2. What is up with x86_64 kernels always being SMP enabled? I noticed a > comment in the release notes, but no reason given as to why. I would Saves a lot of build time, disk and testing effort. Doesn't really cost anything measurable > think this could be problematic for debugging unless there is some boot > option that makes the kernel act 100% like it would with a UP kernel. Makes it easier - we've only got *one* kernel to debug now 8) > 3. Where are the x86_64 Xen 3.0 kernels? All I see are i686 in NYA > 6. I wanted to install galeon.i386 from extras, and it needed to install > mozilla.i386. Being that I am running x86_64, mozilla.x86_64 was already > installed. For some reason mozilla.i386 refused to install, because it > said /usr/bin/mozilla and /usr/share/man/man1/mozilla.1.gz conflicted > with mozilla.x86_64. Both are mozilla-1.7.12-3. Is this a bug in the > package? Is this a bug in rpm? I originally used yum and got the error, > but then I tried rpm directly and received the same error message. Correct behaviour. Its refusing to allow two clashing sets of files to overwrite each other. You need to remove the x86_64 one first. Alan -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list