2006/1/15, n0dalus <n0dalus+redhat@xxxxxxxxx>:
On 1/16/06, Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yes, except that in the case of Flash stripping it of mp3 means
> stripping it of all audio. So not a very useful end result.
>
Oh. I didn't realise Flash only stored mp3 format audio.
A no-audio flash plugin would still be great for many sites though, so
it's better than nothing. And livna could deal with the *-mp3
packages, and that would still be much easier than having to download
macromedia's buggy flash plugin.
I get a 2 second delay for all of the audio when using Macromedia's
plugin anyway, and maybe no sound is better than late sound.
n0dalus.
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
Well without audio it would be half functional. in my eyes what flash delivers is 2 things... "video" and audio and both are required for the overall experience. so while without audio still alot of the "flash menu" stuff is working most flash cartoons dont really since theres no audio. Isnt flash cartoons the no 1 reason to install flash? i am not sure... but i personally dont come across much sites with flash navigation (experiences of other users might differ).
i am just curious if it makes sense to patch audio out completly. maybe suggesting upstream to have audio as a plugin would allow to split it properly into extras and livna. just my personal opinion.
regards,
rudolf kastl
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list