On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 20:50 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 1/14/06, Paul <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Further from this mornings fun over omitting mono from the update and > > not finding any dependency problems, I've done a yum -d 6 -y > > --exclude=mono-code update on the laptop. > > > > The file produced is way too large for including as an email (it's > > around 73k), so I've uploaded it to > > http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/yumoutput.txt > > > > Hopefully, this will help with the trace requested. > > We also need to see what the output looks like that pulls IN mono-core > as you originally claimed. And you should spend the time doing small > group transactions to try to help narrow down what it is pulling in > mono-core on your system. The session when mono-core exclude is not > particularly useful by itself, we need to know what was pulling > mono-core in as you claim to have seen. Save yourself a little time and try doing: yum update nautilus Nautilus recently started needing libbeagle, which need nautilus. Rodd -- "It's a fine line between denial and faith. It's much better on my side" -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list