On 1/15/06, Paul F. Johnson <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > What I normally do is a simple yum -y update based on the previous days > rawhide update. I would imagine that as mono only appeared in the last 6 > days (or so), that a package which previously didn't need mono now does > and that dragged it in and for some reason, I've missed it. you will never track down what you think are dependancy issues if you continue to yum -y and just let the system go ahead with the updates. You need to take more responsibility to proactively watch for oddness before you let the updates proceed by reading over the summary information before the let the updates proceed, stopping and thinking about what you are reeding in the summary information and then troubleshooting what you think is odd. All of this before the update is allowed to complete. As it stands now.. you have a snowball's chance in hell of figuring this out. I suggest you go back do a fresh install of fc5t1 and try to reconfirm how your system got mono-core installed. I personally think you haven't been carefully enough about your package hygiene and don't really have a good understanding of what is going on with your packaging history. And I'm chalking this whole incident up to you mis-remembering what you have actually done in terms of packaging related installs. -jef"end of transmission"spaleta -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list