Paul F. Johnson wrote:
Hi,
If I exclude mono-core, I don't get any dependency failures which means
(to me) nothing in todays rawhide needed it - so why did yum try to
download it?
BE SPECIFIC
wtf SPECFIC dep failures did you encounter?
How specific do I need to be. I exclude mono from the yum update and had
NO, Zilch, NILL, NULL, Nicht, Sweet FA dep failures.
yum goes through all the trouble of giving you the SPECFIC information
about dependancy failures... if you want the rest of us to understand
wtf you are seeing.. we really need to see the SPECIFIC failures as
generated by yum.
Try reading the email then. I exclude mono, I get no dep failures which
means that nothing either on my system or in the updates relies on it.
TTFN
Paul
For maybe a clue to why mono was pulled in, I ended up getting the mono
related rpms when using pirut to update the GNOME desktop. The GNOME
checkbox was not highlighted, so I tried the program to see what was
missing in GNOME. Maybe this is an RPM where missing OK is acceptable.
No idea as to which rpm would cause this though.
Jim
--
We are using Linux daily to UP our productivity -- so UP yours, Microsoft!
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list