On 1/12/06, Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks, removed the mirrors for now and all is working! Good thing, i just tried a boot.iso intall with pretty base and i've been pulling rpms down one by one.... :)
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 18:24 +0100, Kenneth Jensen wrote:
> On 1/12/06, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Neal Becker ( ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx) said:
> > > I tried both smart and yum to update my kde from rawhide. All packages are
> > > reporting bad checksums (yum) or SHA (smart). Is something broken today?
> >
> > They got signed, which appears to be causing problems w.r.t. the sqlite
> > caching - if you do 'yum clean cache dbcache' does it work?
>
> Didn't help me - yesterday I also tried "yum clean all" which didn't
> help either.
>
> --
> ---
> Cheers,
> Kenneth
I just completed the push of a respun rawhide that should contain the
correct checksums in the Yum repodata. Can you give it a try now? Note
that it may take some time for the new repodata to make its way to the
mirrors.
Cheers
-- Dennis
Thanks, removed the mirrors for now and all is working! Good thing, i just tried a boot.iso intall with pretty base and i've been pulling rpms down one by one.... :)
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list