Re: Call for testing rescue.iso

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 00:14 +0000, Andy Burns wrote:
> OK, I'll give it a spin, one thing I have noticed about using boot.iso 
> with "linux rescue" and then using http to retrieve stage2 (or minstage2 
> whatever it is) is that if I decline the automated detect/mount under 
> /mnt/sysimage I can do an "mdadm --assemble" and mount filesystems 
> myself quite happily, but if I accept the automatic detect/mount I get a 
> backtrace ...
> 
> This _could_ easily be related to the software raid issues that have 
> (hopefully) been fixed in today's rawhide, as trying to check failed 
> raid installs is the only time I've needed a rescue CD so far, I'll 
> check and let you know ....

Ok, thats slightly more than I need tested.  If rescue mode itself isn't
working, please file a bug against anaconda.  We know that rescue needs
some love right now, but knowing exactly which love would be good.  I
basically need to know if the rescue.iso even boots and tries to go into
rescue mode.

Thanks!

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]