On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 07:00, dragoran wrote: > Benjy Grogan wrote: > > > Hello: > > > > I know this topic has been mentioned over and over, and everyone is > > irritated by it. But why not meet the Mono project half-way? Why > > can't the hal-sharp and the dbus-sharp, and gtk-sharp add-ons be > > included in the fedora packages? > > or atleast let us build them with a spec file flag. Sounds like a reasonable compromise. However I really can't see why anyone involved in Fedora would want to expend the effort to do it initally or maintain it. But if somebody volunteered the patches it does sound reasonable to expect them to get included. For no matter how much we understand the trap mono represents, it is equally obvious that many people are already leaping into it and mono support WILL happen for certain packages. That means the only question is how much pain will be caused by having the bordering packages forked into the outside repos with the actual mono packages? -- John M. http://www.beau.org/~jmorris This post is 100% M$Free! Geekcode 3.1:GCS C+++ UL++++$ P++ L+++ W++ w--- Y++ b++ 5+++ R tv- e* r -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list