On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 20:12 -0600, Benjamin Youngdahl wrote:
> I would venture the opinion that anything which eases the testing process
> for the users who volunteer to test rawhide will only help the project in
> the long run. Of course, the simple fact that the code itself may be broken
> makes the whole testing process not for the faint of heart.
I don't disagree. We do need to make testing as easy as possible to get
more folks looking at it and reporting actual problems with the
software, not problems getting to the software. I really do think
though that this is a perfect opportunity for a community member to
throw a piece of code together to accomplish this task.
As for signing packages, I do believe they are signed.
4Suite-1.0-9.b1.i386.rpm:
Header V3 DSA signature: OK, key ID 30c9ecf8
Header SHA1 digest: OK (c0ec735eced46931fc12e25bc96894beca6cba39)
MD5 digest: OK (6637a7c0ff8162f4e6c6ca730bd11acf)
V3 DSA signature: OK, key ID 30c9ecf8
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Was I helpful? Let others know:
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list