Am Donnerstag, den 01.12.2005, 10:41 +0100 schrieb Roger Grosswiler: > Am Mittwoch, den 30.11.2005, 16:28 -0500 schrieb Dave Jones: > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:06:29PM +0100, Roger Grosswiler wrote: > > > hey, hey... > > > > > > after struggling, i got my card up - but still not online. Dmesg now > > > says: > > > > > > ndiswrapper version 1.5 loaded (preempt=no,smp=no) > > > ndiswrapper: driver gplus (D-Link,04/09/2004,6.0.0.18) loaded > > > PCI: Enabling device 0000:02:00.0 (0000 -> 0002) > > > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:00.0[A] -> Link [LNKD] -> GSI 11 (level, > > > low) -> IRQ 11 > > > PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:02:00.0 to 64 > > > ndiswrapper (IoCreateUnprotectedSymbolicLink:947): --UNIMPLEMENTED-- > > > ndiswrapper: using irq 11 > > > wlan0: vendor: 'TNET1130' > > > wlan0: ndiswrapper ethernet device 00:0f:3d:59:64:56 using driver gplus, > > > 104C:9066:1186:3B05.5.conf > > > wlan0: encryption modes supported: WEP; TKIP with WPA > > > > > > > > > iiiiiihaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!! it really was acpi messing it up! acpi=0 > > > on boot resolved it. > > > > acpi=0 does nothing at all. It's not a valid option. > > You can see this by the fact you still have ACPI: lines in your dmesg. > > > > Dave > > > > *sigh* i was to early, thanks dave - in this case, the noapic option > must have done the trick - or i was even a lucky guy :-D > > But, even if i have my card now - i don't get the device to set it > up :-( > > Roger > ok, got it now working. it is really a pig, like already said. ifconfig -a told me later, that there exist a device called wlan0 - system-config-network didn't. so, as a first step, i called it manually with ifconfig wlan0 inet [ipadress] netmask [netmask] up -> this worked fine. afterwards, it was also known in system-config-network, so i could do the rest there. Roger -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list