On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:36:24AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Tuesday 11 October 2005 10:13, Steve Grubb wrote: > > So, why is kdemultimedia i386 installed? > > This just gets better... > > [root@spirit ~]# rpm -e kdemultimedia-3.4.91-1.i386 > > So far so good. No complaints from rpm and the disk drive made noise. Now, I > wonder if it left the 64 bit apps alone? > > [root@spirit ~]# rpm -qV kdemultimedia-3.4.91-1.x86_64 > .......T /etc/xdg/menus/applications-merged/kde-multimedia-music.menu > .......T /usr/share/apps/noatun/magictable > missing /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder > missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/apis.docbook > missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/arts-structure.png > missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/artsbuilder.docbook > missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/common > missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/detail.docbook > missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/digitalaudio.docbook > missing d /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/artsbuilder/faq.docbook > > Nope. It ate the files from both packages. Ah, these happen to be the same but most likely are accounted for only in one package to avoid "conflicts". You removed their "owner" and they are gone. No, I do not know that for sure ... BTW - if you are using yum to maintain your system you will be likely safer with yum remove kdemultimedia-3.4.91-1.i386 or just yum remove kdemultimedia.i386 Not that much difference really here but at least you will have traces in /var/log/yum.log and possible dependency chains will be handled for you. Michal -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list