On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 23:14 -0400, Ernest L. Williams Jr. wrote: > On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 22:50 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 22:35 -0400, Ernest L. Williams Jr. wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The following code fragment is now causing problems under gcc 4.0.1 > > > Basically, I have "gcc version 4.0.1 20050919 (Red Hat 4.0.1-14)" from > > > rawhide. > > > > > > Everything is perfect under "gcc version 3.4.3" > > > Any recommended work-arounds? > > > > > > ================= code fragment====================================== > > > #ifndef __LOC_PV_FACTORY_H__ > > > #define __LOC_PV_FACTORY_H__ > > > > > > line 10 --> #include "pv_factory.h" > > > > class LOC_ProcessVariable; > Thanks. Awesome!!! > I am back in business. :) > By the way was that documented anywhere in the RELEASE_NOTES for GCC? It's PR1016 on 2005-05-20 in the changelog. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1016 > Well in recent times: > I think the G++ is becoming more stable/standardized. > I used have a lot more issues everytime the compiler changed. I believe that it's GCC's eventual goal to follow the C++ standard to the letter, and that it's doing an excellent job thus far. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list