On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Patrick wrote:
but I haven't seen anything surface. Imho at the end of the day you
are far better of with postfix with some good rules which will stop
a ton of spam attempts and then add a drop of dspam to kill the
'spamprobe' is also really good. A standalone bayesian filter. See:
http://spamprobe.sf.net
IMHO, Bayesian filtering is far more effective at catching spam than
static rules (SA uses both). Also, I run 'rbl-milter' to add
X-RBL-Milter headers based on DNSBls and I have spamprobe configured
to consider these headers. Which is rather better than configuring
your MTA to reject DNSBl'd mail, cause you don't have to worry about
effectiveness of a DNSBl, particularly overbearing ones - instead
spamprobe will 'learn' how effective different DNSBl's are for you.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@xxxxxxxx paul@xxxxxxxxx Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
If fifty million people say a foolish thing, it's still a foolish thing.
-- Bertrand Russell
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list