On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 09:18:28AM -0400, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 10:02 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On Jul 21, 2005, jakub@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > This update needs to accompany gcc-4.0.1 update. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > * Thu Jul 21 2005 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx> 1.5.16.multilib2-2 > > > - rebuilt with GCC 4.0.1. > > > > Do you realize this is no longer enough? We need apr-devel rebuilds > > to accompany GCC version bumps as well. > > can we please stop any such idiocities in cross package version > depencies???? We really really should not have this kind of dependency. > At all. Ever. Having to update libtool every time gcc's versioned dir changes is perhaps something I could live with, but having to update all packages because of it is silly. It would be preferrable if libtool could special case the versioned directories in gcc $CFLAGS -print-search-dirs in the libtool script and recreate them at runtime using gcc $CFLAGS -print-search-dirs. Jakub -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list