Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:59:37PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:18:40PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> > What about the bloat and slowdown because of the unnecessary spinlocks
> > and more complex scheduler code?
>
> The locks shouldn't matter. AMD got locked operations on exclusive cache
> lines right. Its generally only Intel boxes that had high lock costs.
And the only UP EM64T's I've seen have HT. Though, that could be
disabled, but I expect that the folks disabling it are in a minority.
> Not sure on the scheduler.
It'll degenerate to a single runqueue on UP, so there shouldn't
be any of the complicated balancing going on. Bloat-wise, it's
a tiny amount of change.
Dave
If the smp kernel is to be used for newer laptops, will cpufrequency and
other power management options be included in the smp kernels.
I had troubles with the 1411 version of the kernel not booting. I
switched to the smp version and it booted, but the fan ran constantly.
Also, someone on the regular list seems to have a laptop with HT, so
power management and frequency scaling might be desirable for these
machines.
Jim
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list