Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:27 -0500, Brian Millett wrote: > >>Ok, what does yum check? It is comparing that mod_ssl.1:2.0.54-10 is >>greater than mod_ssl.2.1.6-1 ? >> >>Is this a bug? a feature? > > > mod_ssl 2.0.54-10 has an epoch of 1, hence the 1:. It is entirely > possible that mod_ssl 2.1.6-1 has no explicit epoch, and thus is 0:. > The fun w/ epochs is that epoch always wins version checking. 1:2.4 is > always going to be higher than even say 0:9.3. This is why yum things > that mod_ssl needs to be upgraded. Check your newer mod_ssl and see if > it has an epoch set. > Cool. Thanks! It is a feature. I need to go fix the spec to have an epoch then. Is there a place to see what conventions fedora needs for specs to build correct rpms? -- Brian Millett - [ Garibaldi, "TKO"] "You know, you're demented." -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list