On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 01:49 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:43:48AM +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote: > > > On Atari ST, people _paid_ for commercial alternative file selector > > > boxes! Some of them were really good. :-) > > > > > > I don't understand what's so hard to get _file_selection_ done right. > > > > Mmmm, maybe you have answered your own question ;-] > > Nope. We were paying as the TOS one sucked so hard and all usable > alternatives were at least shareware. Not because there were only few > geniusses who got it right. :-) That's my point. If designing a file selector is so easy, why were so many alternatives available? R. -- "It's a fine line between denial and faith. It's much better on my side"