On Thursday 26 May 2005 04:18, Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2005, Russell Coker wrote: > > The purpose of this list is for people from the community to assist us > > with testing, and this particularly applies to non-default options. It > > would be good if you could help us in this regard. > > It would be nice if you would stop arguing against people using > non-default options then :-) I am not making a blanket argument against ReiserFS. ReiserFS will work fine for /var/spool/news or /var/spool/mail, also it has never had any SE Linux issues for such use, there's the context= mount option and prior to that people were using ReiserFS on SE Linux systems with genfscon entries in the policy to give all ReiserFS files the desired context. One machine I ran had ReiserFS used for /var/spool/squid and was configured such that all ReiserFS files had the type squid_cache_t. Also given the fsck issue, it's probably best to mount ReiserFS file systems as nodev,nosuid. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page