Re: OO,gcc,kernel: which versions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dan Williams ha scritto:

You must balance the stability of software you ship with the features
the software provides.  During development, if you are working with beta
software, you identify bad bugs and you fix those before you ship.  You
don't wait for upstream to fix them because upstream is not shipping
Fedora Core and upstream frankly doesn't care about Fedora Core.  It's a
tradeoff; if you never trade something off, you never ship anything, or
you ship crap that nobody wants to use because its very old.
There is an alternative option:
give OOo 1.1.4 when FC4 will be released, and when OOo 2.0 will come out give it like other updates.

I perfectly know that each projects doesn't care or wait for Fedora, and I know that waiting is not always the best resolution, but also come out with OO that may corrupt your data is not better, do you agree?

b.r.
Cimmo


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]