Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On 5/17/05, Jim Cornette <fct-cornette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm interested in the concept and this sounds like a great feature for
database and shared files between stations.
One question though. Why do the modules specify a certain kernel version
in the src rpms?
you'll have to talk to the maintainer about why its hardcoded...
making it a macro that gets resolved at build time would make some
sense to me... but I also think mash potatos would makes a great cake
frosting so calibrate your opinion of my opinions accordingly. If you
have a technical issue with how this stuff is packaged... bugzilla it,
with a specific proposal on how to fix the issue so the packages
rebuild in a better fashion.
-jef
I'm playing with the spec files and changing the value in the define to
the latest kernel. I am going to try uname -r in the spec files after I
get the needed src files for everything. I believe all needed devel
packages are now installed. uname -r seems rational with an option to
specify which kernel that you desire the modules to be built for.
Next stop, bugzilla.
Thanks!
Jim
--
<change_m2> Will LINUX ever overtake sliced bread as the #1 achievement
of mankind?