> >>My point is that those that read the list will know that a empty list of >>updates packages _probably_ means that no packages were updated, but it >> is >>also likely that something went wrong. We won't know - we'll assume that >>it means no packages are updated. >>Those that are new to the list will see the cryptic e-mail and wonder if >>something is broken. Why not fix it? >> >>If no packages are updated, why announce it to the list? >> > > than your question could be: > hey, where is the daily rawhide-report ? > this probably means that something is broken or no packages are updated > ? Excellent point! So you agree it needs fixing. Marvellous!