On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 18:34 +0200, Maurizio Paolini wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:24:01AM -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 18:15 +0200, Maurizio Paolini wrote: > > > > > > I have a 'dirty' solution which allows me to build a working rpm > > > package for kig (with scripting support). > > > > > > So, first question: whom should I contact in order to discuss this > > > problem? Is this mailing list the appropriate place? > > > > File a bug against kig and it should get to the proper maintainer. > > Let me be clear about this: it is *not* a problem with kig! > everything works fine as soon as the proper gcc compiler is used > and the correct version of libboost is present. This is rather > a problem in the combination of these factors as present in fc4. > This is the reason why I am using this mailing list. Yes, but it is a "bug" with the packaging so a perfectly valid use of redhat/fedora bugzilla. The point is it directs it to the person who is most able to deal with the situation. The list is a fine place to post this sort of stuff also but in your case it seems something that needs to be brought to the attention of the maintainer. The real fix is to get KDE building with GCC 4.0 as soon as feasible but it is understandable what a huge task that is. In any case there is no harm in both filing a bug and posting here. All that being said it is nice to see upstream developers taking an interest in getting their packages working at top capacity in fedora. Cheers, J5